
As social workers, we are often thinking about people’s needs and what the solutions are to the problems our clients face. Frequently, the solution is finding a steady good-paying job, yet in a rural community finding employment can be difficult. Thus, some say small communities need economic development. According to Scales and Streeter, “Rural economic development strategies have been an important public policy focus since the nineteenth century” (2004, p. 209). However, although economic development in a small community is a valuable tool for job gain, it can also threaten the culture of the community, which needs to be considered.
Take for instance Del Norte County, after the logging and fishing industry crashed, the economy wasn’t doing so good. It became what Scales and Streeter refer to as a disinvested community, which is a community with few assets (2004, p. 206). Then in the late 80s, some community asset development occurred in Del Norte when a maximum security prison came in, which is now the counties largest employer, providing jobs for over a thousand people.
The prison succeeded in creating jobs for locals, not only for the people working inside the institution, but also for construction, garbage, maintenance, ect. Nevertheless, not everyone in the local community was in favor of the prison coming into town. Some concerns included bringing in outsiders, bringing criminals to the area, and having the town’s reputation change. Much of this has happened, not to mention the mental and physical health that has affected many people who work inside the institution. I recently stumbled upon this websitehttp://www.pelicanbayprisonproject.org/history.htm. It discusses the idea that Crescent City “sold its soul to the devil” by allowing the prison to set up camp in this small community.
This debate is somewhat similar to the Wal-Mart debate, which is also a business in Crescent City and where most people shop. Like the prison, we may not agree with the principles of Wal-Mark. However, Wal-Marts low prices and the prison’s jobs is what support most of the families in this community. Wal-Mart oppresses people and so do prisons. It is easy to see why these industries are harmful. However, using a strengths perspective there are some positives.
I would definitely like to see more jobs created by creating jobs in preventive services, so people don’t have to go to prison and there are still jobs, but given California’s current budget crisis and the tendency of our society to be crisis driven, I don’t see it happening anytime soon. So it’s a difficult choice. We want the best for the individuals we are working with, yet we also want what is best for the entire community in the long run. So is it the greatest good for the greatest number, or take one case at a time? Should people prevent the construction of new prisons and risk losing their economy, or create jobs for their community and contribute to the oppression of an unjust system?
Take for instance Del Norte County, after the logging and fishing industry crashed, the economy wasn’t doing so good. It became what Scales and Streeter refer to as a disinvested community, which is a community with few assets (2004, p. 206). Then in the late 80s, some community asset development occurred in Del Norte when a maximum security prison came in, which is now the counties largest employer, providing jobs for over a thousand people.
The prison succeeded in creating jobs for locals, not only for the people working inside the institution, but also for construction, garbage, maintenance, ect. Nevertheless, not everyone in the local community was in favor of the prison coming into town. Some concerns included bringing in outsiders, bringing criminals to the area, and having the town’s reputation change. Much of this has happened, not to mention the mental and physical health that has affected many people who work inside the institution. I recently stumbled upon this websitehttp://www.pelicanbayprisonproject.org/history.htm. It discusses the idea that Crescent City “sold its soul to the devil” by allowing the prison to set up camp in this small community.
This debate is somewhat similar to the Wal-Mart debate, which is also a business in Crescent City and where most people shop. Like the prison, we may not agree with the principles of Wal-Mark. However, Wal-Marts low prices and the prison’s jobs is what support most of the families in this community. Wal-Mart oppresses people and so do prisons. It is easy to see why these industries are harmful. However, using a strengths perspective there are some positives.
I would definitely like to see more jobs created by creating jobs in preventive services, so people don’t have to go to prison and there are still jobs, but given California’s current budget crisis and the tendency of our society to be crisis driven, I don’t see it happening anytime soon. So it’s a difficult choice. We want the best for the individuals we are working with, yet we also want what is best for the entire community in the long run. So is it the greatest good for the greatest number, or take one case at a time? Should people prevent the construction of new prisons and risk losing their economy, or create jobs for their community and contribute to the oppression of an unjust system?




